Well, happy "risk-divorce-and-continue-to-ask-your-husband-for-a-third-child day" everyone! I think we'll leave this post well enough alone, with the exception of a few precious photos of some adorable tots on a recent frozen yogurt excursion. I think only a crazy man could say he wouldn't want to add to this glorious mix of DNA:
And contrary to popular belief, new studies show that you actually save money in the long run with three children vs. two. Numerous tax implications amongst a slew of other valid points I prefer not to get into here, but you know, they exist. I pinky swear.
3 comments:
Let's not forget that you need to do it for the sake of science. Geneticists everywhere want to know if each subsequent Stiff child is blessed with even more glorious leg rolls. I mean, COME ON. Those rolls are worth it.
Those rolls are museum-worthy. Even our neighbor came out the other day and called into his wife "honey, come here, you've got to check out Reese's legs". It's her party trick. It'd be shame not to see what a Stiffler #3 could contribute.
Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Hisssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Gulp (Scotch)
Post a Comment